Is Zimbra Free? Zimbra Pricing, Free Edition & 7 Free Alternatives

Is Zimbra free? The answer depends entirely on which edition of Zimbra you are talking about. Zimbra has historically offered a well-known Open Source Edition, but the current Zimbra product lineup and licensing landscape are far more complicated than simply calling Zimbra “free.”

I’m Rock, the founder of Pixel Defence. I spend my days auditing privacy software, investigating Big Tech data practices, and testing tools so normal people don’t get trapped by corporate marketing tricks. When you look at the current Zimbra licensing and product documentation, you uncover a stark difference between free open-source software, commercial subscription editions, limited free trials, and the real-world operational costs of hosting email infrastructure yourself.

Here is the direct, unfiltered truth in one quick reference box:

According to Zimbra’s official licensing portal and product documentation, the days of downloading a simple, zero-cost, fully supported enterprise package are gone. If you are planning an email migration or building a private communications server, you need to understand exactly what happened.

Is Zimbra Free?

When people type is Zimbra free into a search engine, they are usually looking for a straightforward “yes” or “no.” The reality is an evolving corporate transition that caught thousands of systems administrators and businesses off guard.

Zimbra has more than one licensing model

Zimbra has never been just one single piece of software. For nearly two decades, Synacor (Zimbra’s parent entity) maintained a dual-track business model divided into distinct categories:

1. Zimbra Open Source Edition (OSE): A community-focused distribution built on open-source components, licensed primarily under the GNU General Public License (GPLv2) and the Common Public Attribution License (CPAL). It included basic email, webmail, calendar, and contacts without licensing fees.
2. Zimbra Network Edition (NE): A commercial, proprietary subscription tier that added enterprise capabilities such as real-time backup/restore, mobile ActiveSync, S/MIME encryption, delegated administration, and vendor support.
3. Zimbra Free Trials: Time-limited commercial evaluation licenses intended to convert organizations into paying subscribers.
4. Commercial Support & Add-Ons: Paid professional service contracts, security hotfix access, and partner-managed hosting.

In its official licensing documentation, Zimbra continues to reference open-source licensing terms. However, treating Zimbra as a free product today ignores how the vendor packages and distributes its current software.

Is Zimbra Daffodil 10 free?

Zimbra Daffodil (Version 10) is the current generation of the platform. If you go directly to Zimbra’s official edition comparison page, you will find that Zimbra Daffodil v10 requires an active license key. It is sold under two primary commercial tiers: Standard Edition and Professional Edition.

Daffodil 10 does not offer a free, pre-compiled binary download for production use. In fact, starting with version 10.1, Zimbra introduced an even stricter licensing framework powered by the License Daemon Service (LDS). Instead of the older XML-based license files, installations now require an 18 to 26-character alphanumeric license key verified through automated licensing daemons.

This creates massive confusion. Someone searching online reads a forum post from 2017 proclaiming “Zimbra is 100% free open-source software,” downloads the latest installer, and immediately hits a hard licensing prompt demanding commercial credentials. The marketing talks about open roots, but the deployable reality is a paid enterprise product.

What happened to Zimbra Open Source Edition?

To understand how we got here, we have to look at the lifecycle timeline:

• Zimbra 8.8.15 (Joule): This was the last widely distributed Open Source Edition provided as ready-to-run installation binaries. On December 31, 2023, Zimbra 8.8.15 reached its official End of Life (EOL). It no longer receives security patches, bug fixes, or official support from Synacor.
• Zimbra 9 (Kepler): When Zimbra 9 launched, Synacor made a controversial decision: they chose not to release public, pre-built Open Source Edition binaries. The modern web UI was reserved for Network Edition commercial license holders.
• Zimbra 10 (Daffodil): Released exclusively as a licensed product. While Synacor continues to publish underlying source code across various GitHub repositories, they do not publish free, maintained binary packages for the general public.
• Support & Lifecycle Reality: Zimbra’s own official FAQs state that the older Open Source Edition is end-of-life.

Critical Reality: “Open source” and “currently supported/free to deploy” are not the same thing. While Zimbra’s source code exists under open-source licenses, compiling, packaging, securing, and maintaining it without official vendor binary updates requires specialized engineering. Running an unpatched, EOL Zimbra 8.8.15 server connected to the public internet is a major security hazard.

What Does “Free Zimbra” Actually Mean?

When evaluating whether any mail server is free, we must separate marketing buzzwords into four practical definitions:

1. Free as in no license fee

This means you do not pay a vendor a per-mailbox monthly fee or an annual server licensing fee. With legacy Zimbra OSE, your software license cost was \$0. With modern Zimbra Daffodil 10, license fees are mandatory for official builds.

2. Free as in open source

This refers to software freedom—the right to inspect the code, modify it, audit it for backdoors, and compile it yourself. While parts of Zimbra remain open source, Synacor’s distribution model keeps the convenient binaries and enterprise modules behind proprietary paywalls. Open source code does not equate to zero operational cost.

3. Free to self-host

Self-hosting software is never truly free. Even if your software license costs zero dollars, running a functional, resilient mail server requires real hardware and network resources:

• Dedicated Virtual Private Server (VPS) or bare-metal hardware.
• Clean static IPv4 address (vital for email deliverability).
• Custom domain registration and DNS management.
• Persistent NVMe/SSD storage and offsite encrypted backup repositories.
• Automated TLS certificates (Let’s Encrypt / ACME).
• Real-time spam filtering engines and virus definition databases.
• Continuous sysadmin labor to monitor logs, apply OS security patches, and maintain IP reputation.

4. Free email hosting

Many everyday users confuse a “free mail server” with “free email hosting.” Zimbra is a server application; it is not a free webmail service like Proton Mail or Gmail. No one gives you a free inbox on their infrastructure. If you install Zimbra, you are the service provider, the postmaster, and the security team.

Zimbra Free vs Paid — What’s the Difference?

To see why organizations either pay for Zimbra or abandon it for community alternatives, let’s examine the feature breakdown between the legacy open-source track and the current commercial editions:

Data verified against Zimbra’s official edition comparison documentation.

Why Are People Looking for Zimbra Alternatives?

I talk to IT managers, developers, and privacy advocates every week. Nobody migrates away from an email server for fun—migrating mailboxes, calendar appointments, and DNS records is stressful. People are actively hunting for Zimbra replacements because of specific, unavoidable pain points:

1. You want a genuinely free current mail server

You refuse to run unsupported, end-of-life software that has known Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, but you also refuse to pay thousands of dollars in recurring software subscriptions to Synacor.

2. You want modern open-source software

Zimbra was designed in the early 2000s around monolithic Java architectures, OpenLDAP, Apache, and MySQL. Modern sysadmins want streamlined, containerized systems built in memory-safe languages like Rust or Go.

3. You want easier installation and upgrades

Installing and upgrading legacy Zimbra involved navigating complex Perl installation scripts, intricate OS dependencies, and fragile upgrade paths where a single corrupted LDAP schema could destroy the server.

4. You want lower resource requirements

A baseline Zimbra deployment historically demanded a minimum of 8GB to 16GB of RAM just to keep its Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and search indexes from crashing. Modern lightweight servers run on a fraction of that memory footprint.

5. You want a simpler personal or small-team server

If you are running an email server for your family, a small agency, or a privacy collective, deploying an enterprise-sized collaboration suite is overkill. You need reliable message delivery, not complex multi-tenant enterprise administration.

6. You want absolute control over your private data

When vendors close off their software distribution or push proprietary licensing daemons, they introduce corporate lock-in. Real privacy requires verifiable, open-source sovereignty.

7 Free Zimbra Alternatives (Audited & Tested)

Rather than assembling a generic list of random Linux mail packages, I evaluated these 7 alternatives against strict criteria: active development, transparent open-source licensing, practical self-hosting capabilities, and reliable security architectures.

1. Stalwart Mail Server

Positioning: The modern, all-in-one mail server written in Rust.

Stalwart represents the biggest architectural leap in email server technology in recent years. Built from the ground up in memory-safe Rust, it is distributed as a single unified binary that replaces the tangled web of Postfix, Dovecot, and SpamAssassin.

• License: AGPL-3.0 (Community Edition is 100% free and open source).
• Protocols Supported: Native JMAP (JSON Meta Application Protocol), IMAP4, POP3, SMTP.
• Collaboration: Built-in CalDAV (calendars), CardDAV (contacts), and WebDAV (files).
• Security Features: Native SPF, DKIM, DMARC, ARC, DANE, and internal spam filtering.
• Resource Footprint: Remarkably light. Runs smoothly on 512MB to 1GB of RAM.
• Official Portal: Stalwart Open Source

Who should consider it? Anyone who wants a modern, blazingly fast mail server with cutting-edge protocol support (JMAP) and memory safety, eliminating the bloat of legacy enterprise suites.

2. Modoboa

Positioning: A flexible, modular mail hosting platform with an intuitive web admin interface.

Modoboa is an open-source mail hosting and management platform powered by Python and Django. Rather than reinventing the wheel, Modoboa coordinates battle-tested open-source components (Postfix for SMTP, Dovecot for IMAP) and wraps them in a polished, user-friendly management dashboard.

• License: ISC License (permissive open-source).
• Core Stack: Postfix, Dovecot, Python/Django, Amavis/SpamAssassin, Roundcube integration.
• Collaboration: Integrated webmail, calendar, and address book support via extensions.
• Administration: Excellent multi-domain management, visual traffic statistics, and automated DNS record checks (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
• Official Portal: Modoboa

What to watch out for with Modoboa: The installation uses the Python-based modoboa-installer script on dedicated Linux distros (Debian/Ubuntu). While powerful, you must ensure your server meets clean OS prerequisites, and managing package dependencies during major OS upgrades requires careful attention.

3. mailcow: dockerized

Positioning: A complete, enterprise-grade Docker mail suite with modern webmail.

Mailcow is widely considered the gold standard for containerized self-hosted email. It bundles Postfix, Dovecot, Rspamd (state-of-the-art spam filtering), ClamAV (antivirus), Unbound (DNSSEC resolver), and SOGo (groupware webmail) into an orchestrated Docker Compose stack.

• License: GPL-3.0.
• Architecture: 100% Docker and Docker Compose based.
• Collaboration: SOGo groupware provides a modern webmail interface with full calendar (CalDAV), contacts (CardDAV), and Microsoft ActiveSync compatibility.
• Security: Built-in ACME Let’s Encrypt automation, automated DKIM key generation, rate limiting, and brute-force protection via Fail2ban/Netfilter.
• Requirements: Requires a minimum of 4GB to 6GB of RAM (primarily due to ClamAV and Solr indexing).
• Documentation: Mailcow Docs

Best for: Sysadmins and power users who already use Docker and want a full-featured, turnkey collaboration server that rivals Zimbra’s enterprise interface.

4. Mail-in-a-Box

Positioning: The ultimate turnkey appliance for individual and small-office self-hosting.

Mail-in-a-Box takes an opinionated approach: it turns a fresh Ubuntu VPS into a fully automated, secure mail server with zero manual configuration files required. It even acts as its own authoritative DNS server to guarantee that SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and TLSA records are configured perfectly.

• License: CC0 (Public Domain / Open Source).
• Stack: Postfix, Dovecot, Roundcube (webmail), Nextcloud (contacts and calendar), Z-Push (ActiveSync).
• Ease of Deployment: Run a single curl command on a fresh Ubuntu box and answer a few guided prompts.
• Limitations: Strictly requires a dedicated Ubuntu LTS instance; intentionally lacks custom multi-tenant tweaking to keep the automated appliance stable.

Best for: Individuals, freelancers, and small businesses who want a secure, unbloated personal email server without manually editing Postfix configuration files.

5. Mailu

Positioning: A modular, lightweight Docker-based mail system designed for microservice environments.

Mailu is a containerized distribution created by privacy enthusiasts who wanted the flexibility of Docker without the heavier memory footprint of larger suites. It allows administrators to enable or disable specific containers (like antivirus or webmail) based on available system resources.

• License: MIT License.
• Webmail Options: Choose between Roundcube or Snappy webmail interfaces.
• Key Features: Comprehensive administration web UI, RESTful management API, integrated Rspamd, and automated TLS certificate fetching.
• Flexibility: Can be deployed via standard Docker Compose, Docker Swarm, or Kubernetes Helm charts.

Best for: DevOps engineers and administrators running resource-constrained VPS instances who want modular container isolation.

6. iRedMail

Positioning: The established, rock-solid traditional Linux mail server distribution.

Launched over 15 years ago, iRedMail is one of the most mature open-source mail server deployment scripts available. It automates the installation and security hardening of Postfix and Dovecot on top of standard enterprise Linux distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux).

• License: Core scripts are open source (GPLv2).
• Database Backends: Supports OpenLDAP, MySQL, MariaDB, and PostgreSQL backends.
• Webmail: Deploys Roundcube webmail out of the box with SOGo available as an option.
• Commercial Model: The core mail stack is 100% free. iRedMail offers an optional paid web administration panel called “iRedAdmin-Pro” for advanced GUI management, though the free command-line scripts handle all essential mailbox administration.

Best for: Organizations that prefer native package managers over Docker containers and need proven, traditional enterprise database backends like OpenLDAP or PostgreSQL.

7. Mox

Positioning: A modern, dependency-free mail server written entirely in Go.

Mox is a breath of fresh air in the email landscape. Developed by Mechanux in Go, it is a single-binary server that incorporates SMTP, IMAP4, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DANE, automatic Let’s Encrypt TLS certificates, and account management without requiring external databases or third-party packages.

• License: MIT License.
• Modern Standards: Native support for modern deliverability standards, automated ACME HTTP/TLS-ALPN challenges, and internationalized email (IDNA).
• Security: Strict sandboxing, fuzz-tested parser libraries, and built-in junk filtering.
• Deployment: Single binary with an interactive quickstart command that configures a production-ready domain in under 10 minutes.
• Repository: GitHub mjl-/mox

Best for: Tech-forward privacy advocates and developers who want a self-contained, auditable mail server with zero operational bloat.

Zimbra vs Free Alternatives — Comparison Table

To help you evaluate each platform at a glance, here is a verified comparison matrix based on current releases:

Which Zimbra Alternative Should You Choose?

There is no single “best” mail server for everyone. Instead of relying on generic top-ten rankings, use this decision framework based on your real operational needs:

• If you want the most modern, memory-safe architecture: Go with Stalwart. Its native JMAP implementation and low resource footprint make it the most future-proof open-source mail server available.
• If you need a complete, drop-in Zimbra groupware replacement: Deploy mailcow: dockerized. With its integrated SOGo interface, native ActiveSync, and advanced spam filtering, it matches Zimbra’s collaboration features without per-user licensing fees.
• If you want a personal, hands-off mail appliance: Choose Mail-in-a-Box. It automates DNS, TLS, and updates on a fresh Ubuntu server, saving you dozens of hours of manual configuration.
• If you manage traditional multi-tenant infrastructure: Investigate Modoboa or iRedMail. Both give you robust control over Postfix and Dovecot with flexible database backends.
• If you are a developer looking for zero dependencies: Spin up Mox. Its single-binary Go architecture and automated TLS setup represent minimalist engineering at its finest.
• If you specifically need commercial vendor SLAs and enterprise compliance: Compare Zimbra’s current Daffodil subscription pricing against proprietary alternatives like Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, rather than assuming open-source tools will provide commercial legal indemnification.

Are Free Zimbra Alternatives Really Free?

At Pixel Defence, I believe in radical honesty. Open-source software eliminates vendor license extortion, but self-hosting email involves hidden operational costs that many first-time administrators overlook:

1. Infrastructure Expenses

You cannot run a production email server on a residential broadband connection because virtually all consumer ISPs block outbound TCP port 25 to prevent botnet spam. You must rent a cloud server or VPS with:

• Dedicated compute (2 to 4 vCPUs recommended).
• 2GB to 8GB of RAM depending on your antivirus engine.
• Persistent NVMe storage for mailboxes and attachments.
• Secure, encrypted offsite snapshot backups.
• Estimated cost: \$10 to \$40 per month.

2. Domain & DNS Management

You need a custom domain name and access to an authoritative DNS provider that supports rapid TTL updates, PTR (reverse DNS) mapping, and advanced TXT records.

3. Deliverability & IP Reputation Costs

This is the hidden time sink. Cloud VPS providers (like DigitalOcean, Linode, or Hetzner) often allocate recycled IP addresses that were previously abused by spammers. Cleaning up a blacklisted IP address requires opening delisting tickets with Spamhaus, Barracuda, Microsoft SNDS, and Google Postmaster Tools.

4. Ongoing Maintenance & Security Patching

A mail server is a live target exposed to automated vulnerability scanners, brute-force bots, and credential-stuffing attacks 24 hours a day. You are responsible for monitoring firewall logs, renewing SSL/TLS certificates, upgrading packages, and testing disaster recovery backups. Free software does not provide free sysadmin labor.

Self-Hosted Email Has One Major Problem People Ignore

Here is the inconvenient truth that few tech blogs will tell you: Sending email is not the same as having your email delivered.

You can install mailcow or Stalwart in fifteen minutes. You can configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with 100% cryptographic precision. Yet, the moment your brand-new server sends an email to a recipient hosted on Gmail, Outlook, or Yahoo, your message may quietly land in their spam folder—or be silently discarded without a bounce notification.

Big Tech email cartels operate opaque, proprietary reputation algorithms. They penalize fresh IP addresses that lack established sending histories. If your business depends on invoices, client contracts, or password reset emails arriving reliably in the inbox, establishing IP warming protocols and navigating corporate postmaster blocklists can become an exhausting part-time job.

Are Zimbra Alternatives More Private?

Because Pixel Defence is dedicated to exposing digital surveillance, I often hear readers say: “I am switching to a self-hosted mail server so Google and the government can’t read my emails.”

Self-hosting gives you infrastructure sovereignty, but it does not magically make email private. Here is what actually happens under the hood:

What self-hosting genuinely protects:

• Data at Rest: Your mailbox database, drafts, archived folders, and server logs sit on your private disk. Google, Microsoft, and advertising aggregators cannot scan your inbox to build targeted ad profiles.
• Account Control: Nobody can arbitrarily suspend your account, de-platform your domain, or lock you out of your communications without recourse.
• Log Retention: You define retention policies. When you delete a message, it is actually purged from the storage volume.

What self-hosting cannot protect:

• In-Transit Exposure: Traditional SMTP communication was designed in the 1980s as cleartext. While opportunistic TLS (STARTTLS) encrypts traffic between servers, it does not guarantee end-to-end encryption.
• The Recipient Problem: If you send an email from your ultra-secure, self-hosted Stalwart server to a friend on Gmail, Google still receives and scans the entire message on their servers. Your private server cannot protect data once it lands in Big Tech’s inbox.
• Network Metadata Leaks: Mail headers contain originating IP addresses, relay timestamps, and client user-agent strings. When you send email from a desktop client, you may inadvertently expose your local workstation details.

Before you send sensitive documents through any email server, make sure you scrub hidden tracking data. Use my free client-side Metadata Scrubber to strip GPS coordinates and camera serial numbers from attachments, and test what your active browser leaks using the Data Leak Analyzer.

Free Zimbra Alternative vs Private Email Provider

If your primary motivation is digital privacy rather than learning Linux system administration, running your own server might not be the most sensible route. Let’s compare the three models:

If you want ironclad privacy without the operational headache of maintaining reverse DNS and unblocking IP addresses, pairing an encrypted email provider with an audited VPN is often a cleaner approach. Check out my hands-on testing in my Proton VPN review 2026 to see how verified no-logs networks defend your identity, or use my VPN Leak Test to verify your connection security right now. If you frequently transfer sensitive documents, consider using private file sharing without signup instead of attaching large files to email.

What I Would Check Before Installing Any Free Mail Server

Before spinning up a fresh VPS and pointing your MX records at a new mail server, run through this pre-flight verification checklist:

1. Technical Architecture Checklist

• Is the software project under active development with releases in the last 90 days?
• Are pre-built binary packages or official container images maintained for your OS?
• Does your hosting provider permit unblocked outbound traffic on TCP port 25?
• Can your hosting provider set a custom Reverse DNS (PTR) record matching your server’s hostname?
• Does the server possess sufficient dedicated RAM (at least 2GB for basic servers, 6GB for full groupware)?

2. Email Authentication & Security Checklist

• SPF (Sender Policy Framework): TXT record created authorizing your server’s IP address.
• DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail): Cryptographic 2048-bit public key published in DNS.
• DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication): Policy record configured with strict reporting (p=quarantine or p=reject).
• TLS Certificates: Automated renewal configured via Let’s Encrypt / Certbot.
• Brute-Force Defense: Fail2ban, Netfilter, or Rspamd rate-limiting enabled on authentication ports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Zimbra completely free?

No. Zimbra is not completely free. While the legacy Open Source Edition had no software license fee, it has been retired. The modern Zimbra Daffodil (v10) release requires a paid commercial license key and a running License Daemon Service.

Is Zimbra Open Source still free?

The source code repositories for Zimbra components remain publicly accessible under open-source licenses, but official, pre-compiled, and supported Open Source Edition binaries are no longer provided by Synacor. The last official binary release (8.8.15) reached official End of Life on December 31, 2023.

Is Zimbra Daffodil free?

No. According to Zimbra’s official edition comparison documentation, Zimbra Daffodil 10 requires a paid commercial subscription and is offered under Standard and Professional license tiers.

Is Zimbra 10 free?

No. Zimbra 10 is the commercial brand name for Zimbra Daffodil. It requires an active 18 to 26-character license key to complete installation and maintain functionality.

Does Zimbra have a free version?

Zimbra offers time-limited evaluation trials for its commercial editions, but it no longer offers a free, officially supported production version for general download.

What is the free version of Zimbra?

Historically, the free version was known as Zimbra Collaboration Open Source Edition (OSE). The final binary release was Zimbra 8.8.15 GA, which is now discontinued and unsupported.

Is Zimbra open source?

Zimbra has open-source roots, and portions of its code remain under open licenses like GPLv2. However, the modern platform is packaged, distributed, and supported as a commercial enterprise product, with proprietary extensions and modern web interfaces locked behind commercial licenses.

What is the difference between Zimbra Open Source and Network Edition?

Zimbra Open Source Edition provided basic email, webmail, and shared address books without vendor support or real-time backup tools. Zimbra Network Edition is the paid commercial version that includes automated real-time backup/restore, native mobile ActiveSync, S/MIME, delegated administration, and vendor support SLAs.

What is the best free alternative to Zimbra?

The best alternative depends on your operational needs. If you want a modern, memory-safe server with JMAP support, Stalwart is the top choice. If you need a complete drop-in groupware replacement with a rich webmail interface, mailcow: dockerized is the most capable platform.

Is self-hosted email free?

Software licenses can be free (\$0), but running self-hosted email requires recurring expenses for cloud server hosting, dedicated IP addresses, automated backup storage, and ongoing administrative maintenance.

Is Zimbra better than mailcow?

For large corporate deployments requiring formal vendor support contracts and legacy enterprise integrations, Zimbra provides commercial backing. However, for modern self-hosters and agile IT teams, mailcow is significantly easier to install, maintain, and upgrade due to its modular Docker architecture and lack of per-user license fees.

Is self-hosted email more private?

Self-hosting keeps your mailbox data away from corporate ad scanners like Google and Microsoft. However, because email travels across public network relays, unencrypted messages are still readable by recipient mail servers and network interceptors unless you implement end-to-end PGP encryption.

Can I host my own Zimbra server?

Yes, you can self-host Zimbra on private hardware or cloud instances, but for modern releases like Daffodil 10, you must purchase a commercial license from Synacor or an authorized Zimbra partner.

Final Verdict: Is Zimbra Free?

When you cut through decades of legacy forum posts and vendor marketing, is Zimbra free today? The answer is an unequivocal no for modern production deployments.

While Zimbra built its reputation on a popular Open Source Edition that served millions of mailboxes for two decades, Synacor has transitioned the platform into a commercial-first enterprise product. Zimbra Daffodil 10 requires a paid commercial license key, and the older Open Source Edition has been officially end-of-life since December 31, 2023. Running unpatched, legacy Zimbra installations exposes your organization to severe security vulnerabilities.

If your objective is to deploy a reliable, genuinely free self-hosted mail server, the open-source community has evolved far beyond legacy Java monoliths. Projects like Stalwart, mailcow, and Mox offer superior memory safety, containerized simplicity, and modern protocol support without demanding expensive license keys.

Choose your platform based on your technical comfort level, budget for infrastructure, and deliverability requirements. But whatever you do, stop waiting for a free release of Zimbra Daffodil—it isn’t coming.